Poor Charlie. (16 Reasons Why Charlie Gilmour Shouldn’t Have Been Given 16 Months)

5 Comments

Charlie Gilmour – 21 year old son of Pink Floyd guitarist David – was jailed for 16 months on Friday after pleading guilty to violent disorder at last December’s tuition fee protests. The Cambridge University student was plastered across the next days’ papers after this photograph of him swinging from the Cenotaph was taken . Here are 16 reasons why Charlie Gilmour should not have been given a 16 month custodial sentence… More

What’s Worse for the Future of Students’ Safe Sex: the STI ‘Superbug’ or a Catholic Education?

3 Comments

Students have sex. A lot. In fact, we’re pretty much the only demographic who are dictated by cliché stereotypes to actually have enough sex.

So news of a new ‘STI Superbug’ – a strand of gonorrea resistant to antibiotics – that has been discovered in Japan and is predicted to spread around the world within ten years is certainly bad news for a generation the Mail label as accustomed to ‘increased promiscuity’. (I don’t think this is necessarily the case but I couldn’t resist linking to an article where the Mail makes the sweeping unsubstantiated claim that all young people are a bunch of sluts).

However, a conversation with a 15 year-old I knew this afternoon had me choking on my own disbelief over the 6 o’clock news and thinking about an even bigger threat to the sex habits of young people. The subject of our conversation? The sex education assembly she had at her Catholic school today. Something that I suggest poses a greater threat than an antibiotic-resistant strand of gonorrea. More

How cheap is the booze and where’s the nearest beach? Government’s White Paper puts students at the heart of the system, but do they actually want to be there?

2 Comments

This week I set about researching a piece for The National Student on students’ reaction to the government’s White Paper on proposed Higher Education reforms.

The paper was finally released six months after its accompanying motion was passed in Parliament last December in the midst of those student protests that dominated headlines across the country.  It sets out proposals which, put simply, are supposed to justify their plans to allow Universities to charge up to £9,000 per year in tuition fees from the academic year 2012/13. Main proposals in the paper include lifting restrictions on the amount of places Universities can give to prospective students with A-Level results of AAB or higher to effectively encourage competition between Universities for the brightest students, and mandating greater transparency of data such as contact hours and graduates’ starting salaries at Universities in order to help potential students decide where they want to apply. More

Editorial Independence Threatened: An Open Letter from the Wessex Scene

2 Comments

This is the accompanying picture for the article published on Wessex Scene online, Editorial Independence Threatened: An Open Letter from the Wessex Scene.  

Image by Emily Cotton and David Goymer.

The So:baring Truth About Student Editorial Independence?

10 Comments

One thing that I have struggled with throughout my time as News Editor for the Wessex Scene – the University of Southampton Student Union’s student publication – has been its relationship with the Union itself.

Who is in charge and has final say over what goes in the Wessex Scene? Is it the students? Perhaps the Editor? Maybe VP Media and Comms? Or is it Union Management? Let’s face it, it’s official title I have already given is a bit of a mouthful – ‘ the University of Southampton Student Union’s student publication…’ Some people would have their own clear ideas, and anyone can offer any one of those responses to that question. More

SUSUtv Wins with a Fresh Perspective at this year’s NaSTA Awards

Leave a comment

SUSUtv can now be referred to as nationally award winning after the Southampton University Student’s TV station picked up two awards at this year’s NaSTA (National Student Television Association) Awards. More

Begging the Question: Are students equipped to deal with controversial issues as they once were?

10 Comments

Just last month Universities UK published a report calling for Vice-Chancellors to avoid banning controversial speakers on campuses; consequential debates regarding student extremism and freedom of speech spawned across the web, and, last week the issue could not be more relevant to students in Southampton as controversial former Guantanamo Bay detainee Moazzam Begg gave a lecture to students at the University as part of Islamic Awareness Week.

Freedom of speech is one of the greatest and most taken for granted aspects of democratic societies and, traditionally, students are looked to as champions for its promotion and the advocating of new liberal ideas permitted by this freedom.

Students are seen to lead the revolutions. Campuses are meant to be where intellectual debate is expected at its most broad-minded and advanced, and the next generation are looked to for an understanding of sociological development that the older generation may have overlooked, or have become too accustomed to the traditional that they are unable to understand. Or, at least, this is the common thought. More

Older Entries